Alaska Sues to Regain Control of Elections

State Sovereignty Called into Question.

Tools

by Mike Ford

The State of Alaska went to court Tuesday, challenging federal authority when it comes to voting rights.

The suit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is aimed at U.S. Attorney Eric Holder and the Department of Justice challenging Washingtons authority to require "preclearance" before Alaska can make any changes in state election laws and procedures.

The Parnell administrations complaint contends that the "preclearance requirement infringes on the states sovereignty, hampering the ability to run timely and efficient elections..refrencing recent litigation that could have impacted this years election

The State says "preclearance" isn't warranted based on the State's voting rights history.

Alaska is among at least six states or jurisdictions challenging continuing enforcement of the 1965 law meant to prevent voting discrimination based on race or color.

The State became one of 16 Jurisdictions covered by the law when it was extended in 1975 to include language minorities.

The U.S. Supreme Court may decide in October whether to hear a challenge to this section of the voting rights act brought by Shelby County, Alabama.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Dan Law said on Thursday, Aug 23 at 11:59 PM

Tell the fed to kiss where the sun doesn't shine. They made Alaska a state. That confers State Rights. It isn't any of their concern if there has been no problem. They're just trying to stave off another Arizona problem.

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

Coastal Television | AK News, Weather and Sports | and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.